We think science needs to be communicated with more passion and professionalism.


On our website with interviews & resources + on social media + on Skype and IRL.


Right now – as a matter of fact, we’ve just geared up.

Science and trust – two words that go together

“Science” and “trust” – two words that go together like “pen” and “pencil” or “fish” and “chips” (especially if you are from my native UK). Science and the scientific process place a big part in our daily lives; from the washing up liquid we use to wash our dishes, to the cars we see on our roads, and the smartphones we carry and use daily. Basically, without science, we don’t have the world we have become accustomed to.

Yet, recently, there has been a huge move towards anti-science. There has been a huge rise in the anti-vaxxer movement. To the extent that there have been outbreaks of measles in countries that had almost eradicated the disease. With COVID-19, we have huge swathes of people refusing to comply with governments about wearing masks, despite the scientific evidence. (Yes, there are a lot of people who can’t wear masks for medical reasons, but not for the reasons being used by these individuals.) For every person wanting to stop the very real threat of climate change, there is least one climate change denier.

Why has this sudden surge in anti-science opinion come about? Is it that governments headed by politicians we don’t trust are telling us to “follow the science”? Is it because there are so many avenues that miscommunication can arise? From Twitter and Facebook, to radio and television. Could it be that the way we are communicating science isn’t working? Is it time that we, as science communicators, sit down and listen to these individuals to see what is stopping them from trusting science? What is their fear?

Maybe it’s time for us to re-start the discussion.

For The Crastina Crew

Dr Claire Price, Writer

Crastina Content