“I’m specialised in understanding three things: firstly the subject itself, and secondly the perspectives of the two groups that I serve, i.e. senders and receivers.” So says Fredrik Saarkoppel, Swedish freelance illustrator with many clients in academia and the tech industry. This post introduces our summer theme: “Working with the pros”.
It was a very peculiar situation. I had been studying the illustration before me on the screen for a while – an infographic that should explain the inner workings of CRISPR. Something seemed wrong with it. I compared my sketch to the instructions and graphic outlines that I had been given, but I just couldn’t put my finger on the problem.
The strange thing was that the customer didn’t agree with me. She thought the visual explanation worked well.
So, what should I say? I’m only a technical illustrator with a B.Sc. from a university you’ve never heard of. She was the assistant professor and PI from one of my country’s academic flagships. The most diplomatic thing I could come up with was that “I apparently hadn’t understood the process”.
Two hours later she gave me a phone call – and apologized! She had done a mistake. I was right about her being wrong.
This anecdote comes to mind every time I discuss the relationship between experts and professional communicators. Like, for example, when people from academia or R&D departments work with journalists or illustrators. This cooperation sometimes runs very smoothly, and both parts do their best to learn from and to understand the other part. But I have also experienced the opposite: that science people seem to be from Mercury while communication people are from Jupiter.
For a successful communication process, a central prerequisite needs to be fulfilled: the identification of the target audience. And in the case we are talking about here, this audience is neither fully educated peers or uneducated but interested laymen, but a third kind: professionals with an another background and way of seeing things. Sometimes I get the impression that experts have forgotten how it was to not be an expert. Their use of esoteric terms and abstract explanations slows down the exchange of information, very often in an unnecessary way.
As a visual communicator, I must not be discouraged by specialist jargon and expert knowledge; instead, I need to take the lead to get the process going. I know that the best way to help my customer (and eventually their target group) is to trust my own expertise: explaining complex stuff in a concise, structured and appealing way. My observation point as well as my work space are between the sender and the receiver. Through the years, I have seen a lot of different senders presenting all types of content to a wide variety of receivers. Or to put it differently: I am a proud intermediary that has specialized in understanding three things: firstly the subject itself, and secondly the perspectives of the two groups that I serve, i.e. senders and receivers.
Experts in academia and industry have a lot to gain from trusting the skills of professional communicators and become accomplished buyers of such services. It saves time, it saves money, it saves frustration and – especially important! – the end result gets better. The first step to get there is to build a foundation of healthy and mutual respect of both trades. The second step is to practice the art of identifying the target audience which normally varies wildly from nerdy peers to preoccupied members of the public. The third step is to find a common language, without jargon or unnecessary lingo. Personally, I have been fortunate enough to work with people with these abilities.
Fredrik Saarkoppel is a science nerd, designer, illustrator, animator and writer who occasionally is trying innovation. Uncomplicating things through his own business Kobolt Media, situated in Eskilstuna, 120 km west of Stockholm, Sweden.
- Meet Sarang Park – manager of @IAmSciComm - September 28, 2018
- Sharing an experience we all can relate to – our childhood - September 5, 2018
- Sci Foo: intense intellectual, interdisciplinary interaction for influencers - July 17, 2018
- Agile Science #3: Xavier came up with Agile Research a decade ago - February 23, 2018
- Randy McIntosh, neuroscientist: “I see parallels between the process of discovery in science and musical improvisation” - January 29, 2018
- Clear storyline & stick figures won the Swedish Forskar Grand Prix competition - January 24, 2018
- John Hinton: ”The science of music, and the music of science” - January 9, 2018
- Rahim Munir: ”There are multiple gains with having a personal website” - December 3, 2017
- Nikola Vukovic, Aarhus Uni: “My website helps me keep a consistent professional profile online” - November 14, 2017
- Crastina Column, Nov–Dec 2017: ”Why you A-B-S-O-L-U-T-E-L-Y need a personal website as a scientist” by Stephan van Duin - November 2, 2017