Forskar Grand Prix is a yearly event in Sweden where researchers are challenged to present their research in four minutes. To be a winner, your talk should be “captivating, inspiring and educational”. Peter Ueda from Karolinska Institutet showed that he mastered this – and got quite a bit of media coverage for a presentation with a very personal visual language.
Tell me a little about your background and why you decided to compete in the Forskar Grand Prix competition.
I’m an intern physician at Södersjukhuset and researcher at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm. I use large datasets and statistical methods to investigate health care related questions. The public relations office at Karolinska asked me to participate in Forskar Grand Prix, so I did.
What was your winning formula, according to yourself?
I outlined the presentation as a movie, where I narrated the story while showing pictures, over 50 of them, to support it. I tried to make the content and conclusions nuanced and scientific by not overselling the ideas while making the story of how we came up with the hypothesis and investigated it more entertaining. I tried to be entertaining without using hype or start-up-y pitching.
Tell me about your illustrations – are you an amateur artist, or is this something that you came up with for the talk?
I have always liked drawing but to call myself an artist would be a stretch. Some of the stick figures that I used were based on an internet meme, which I adjusted and integrated into my storyline. I like playing with the contrast between serious content (science) and silly and sarcastic pictures.
Please give three pieces of advice to the early career scientist who intends to take part in a lightning talk competition with talks aimed at a general public!
- Do not compromise your scientific integrity. Even if it is a “pitching contest”, as a researcher you may not want to oversell your hypothesis or draw punchline-friendly conclusions from limited data or speculations. There are other ways to communicate your enthusiasm for your subject than hype.
- Start with a storyline and then create the pictures. Due to the dominance of powerpoint as a presentation tool, it has become common to first create pictures or “slides” and then talk about them. A narrating voice and pictures are the same components as in a documentary movie and there is no director who first cuts the film and then think about what to say. Start instead with a storyline and then create pictures to support your narration.
- Pictures are free. Remember that time is the constrained resource in your presentation and not pictures, they are free. Instead of cramming one picture with a lot of information, you can split the content into many pictures that correspond to what you are saying at the time of showing them.
Read more about Researchers’ Grand Prix. It is organised jointly by the Swedish non-profit organisation VA (Public & Science), the Swedish Research Council (VR), the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas), the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working life and Welfare (Forte) and the Sweden’s Innovation Agency (VINNOVA).
- Kolisa Yola Sinyanya, Cape Town: ‘I won their hearts with SciComm!’ - March 21, 2019
- Global Lab – building Ghana’s open science and innovation community. - February 25, 2019
- TCC in Nairobi teaches effective communication to scientists - January 25, 2019
- The beginning of a new era: science communication in Africa - January 13, 2019
- TAP helps prospective students choose dream university - January 4, 2019
- Meet Sarang Park – manager of @IAmSciComm - September 28, 2018
- Sharing an experience we all can relate to – our childhood - September 5, 2018
- Sci Foo: intense intellectual, interdisciplinary interaction for influencers - July 17, 2018
- Agile Science #3: Xavier came up with Agile Research a decade ago - February 23, 2018
- Randy McIntosh, neuroscientist: “I see parallels between the process of discovery in science and musical improvisation” - January 29, 2018